Election 2016, Coroner's Report, Appendix I

In light of Trump's victory large portions of non-classical liberals have gone completely off the rails. Never mind the wailing and gnashing of teeth on youtube. Rioting has broken out in several liberal cities, and there's even calls for a California secession (I was laughing as I wrote that last one, stupid ass regressives...).

Take a moment for that to settle in. The United States' federal government has made it known that the member states of the US cannot just simply leave when they please. The people who want a "Calexit" are Hillary supporters. Hillary and generally her supporters support strict gun-control, so it's reasonable to say that these people aren't the people who own the guns in this state. I'd like to see them draw me a diagram of how they expect that one to happen. That just goes to show how completely unhinged and off the rails some segments of Hillary supporters have gone, since it's obvious that the ones who are serious about this, haven't exactly thought it though (Odds are there are enough gun owners in California who are loyal to the US to put down any such insurrection from these people without the need for military support, especially given that these people do not want to live in the California that these Hillary supporters want).

Now with all of this going on, I'm wondering how long until the introspection phase sets in. How long until these people take a good long look at the mirror and realize that they are partly the reason Trump was elected. This election season was a wholly toxic one, possibly the most toxic one I've personally seen. But for the Democrats, there was an added twist, they were in the same position as the Republicans were in 2008 in more ways than one. One of those ways was being the party/ideology in power, and passing down moral decrees on the people. The whole "Gamergate" thing, "3rd Wave Feminism", Politically Correct, Safe Space needing Social Justice Warriors, etc. all that culture war crap, all filled the same role that right wing Christians like John Ashcroft filled in society as the Morality Police.

This was a multi-faceted disaster of the Democrat's own making.

I'll focus on the cultural/social part of this disaster here.

From the start Hillary made her campaign about her gender. It wasn't just about her as the individual but about her being the first female president. From the start he campaign was playing the identity politics game. Memory is a bit hazy, but from what I recall of Barack Obama's 2008 campaign, him being half-Black wasn't really a pillar of his campaign, it was a peripheral issue, it wasn't "vote for me so we can have our first Black president", it was vote for me and we'll change the tone in Washington. The man giving us this message just happened have a Black father.

On the surface that doesn't seem like a big deal and it wouldn't be really, but then there's the matter of her supporters, the ones carrying the message (mainly the regressive left). As I mentioned earlier, this campaign was about as toxic as Chernobyl. Whether that was something that seeped from the bottom up into Hillary's campaign, or from the top down from the campaign down to the supporters is moot point. What matters is how the message of vote for Hillary was delivered. It wasn't done in a way of "vote for Hillary because..." but rather "If you don't stand with Her you are, sexist/misogynist!" Any argument against voting for Hillary was casually swept away with a waive of the hand and an unsubstantiated claim of "you're a misogynist/sexist/hate women/support institutional" oppression with a sprinkling of "patriarchy".

But beyond what amounts to name calling, because all of this talk was tied in with identity, the whole thing became personal. And because these people, these regressive leftists, hitched their identity to a particular political candidate, when that candidate is reject, be it though people refusing to vote for them, or... losing an election... they feel that it is a rejection of them as an individual. That what they identify has been deemed invalid. So as a result, they double down on the vitriolic rhetoric, because for them, they are literally defending who they are. Because they feel they are literally defending who they are, they have no interest in dialogue with the other side. Why? Because they are the victim. Oh yes, the mythical Victim, the creature in which everyone needs to just sit down, shut up, and listen to and believe, because allegedly something damaging happened to them and what they have to say is automatically valid because of that sole fact. This gets amplified when the people seeing their identity under attack, are the coddled, overly emotional, hyper sensitive, helicopter parented, participation trophy types to the point where the vitriol gets to the level that it did. People that never learned how to cope with and move on from losing.

Everything is sexist, everything is racist, and they have to point it out. And they did just that.

And everyone got tired of it.

Everyone.

The thing was, they spread this vitriol to beyond open Trump supporters. Everyone from disgruntled Bernie supporters, to third party voters, to the apathetic and indifferent got targeted by this poison. "You don't want to vote for Hillary?! Well you MUST be sexist! You don't like her because she's a woman!" Or better yet the even more convoluted chain of thinking, "Trump speaks out against immigrants, Hillary opposes Trump, you don't support Hillary, therefore you are against immigration and therefore you are racist." Keep saying that enough and people are going to get tired of your shit. Maybe, just maybe get tired enough for vote for the other guy just out of spite.

People will especially grow tired of this, when most of the perceived sexism and racism isn't even there. It's crying wolf when there is no wolf. The people that were howling about this, were literally looking anywhere and everywhere for anything that could even remotely be considered sexist or racist by the most of fringe elements. Eventually, people will stop listening to you, and the louder you shout, the more people just want you to shut the hell up.

When you start lumping everyone into classes based on superficial identities, people will grow tired of your horse shit. You can't just group people by class, and then brow beat that class into getting them to do what you want. It blatantly ignore the individual, by doing that, don't you deny that individual's experience? While at the same time pattering on and on about the individual experiences in your preferred classes to justify your totalitarian positions.

For the most part, no one cares about identity politics. Most person are too busy taking care of their every day responsibilities to care about identity politics. Yet all of these people also got targeted by the vitriol. When you're trying to make ends meet, you don't really appreciate some young inexperienced jackass browbeating because you're not with her, when all you're trying to do is keep a roof over your head and food on your table. These people are either going to ignore you and continue to not care, or they are going to vote the other guy just to spite you, just to give you the finger.

Though, all this rioting, protesting a fair election and calls for secession should have been expected and should be no surprise to anyone considering the deplorable behavior of some of Hillary's supporters during the general election. We have people trespassing onto private property and stealing Trump campaign signs, this amounts to theft as well as silencing someone's voice by preventing them from displaying their support for someone/thing. Then we have an act of arson. Then we have destruction of public property. Even to the point of assaulting and battering a homeless person. Sure there are those on Trump's side that was guilty of the same thing, but that isn't the point. They're not the ones rioting and calling for secession right now. Secondly, I thought "love trumps hate"? Since when is destruction of property and acts of violence on another, a show of love? And all the rioting and and calls for secession just further justify's people's support for Trump in their minds, further proves their point about Hillary's supporters in their mind, as unhinged overly emotional leftists. Third, the Democrats always like to paint themselves as better than Trump's supporters, so when are they going to prove that to me with their actions?

This wasn't just a repudiation of the political establishment. This was also a repudiation of the regressive leftist Morality Police. Americans just don't like being told what to do, they didn't like it when it was conservative Christians during George W Bush's tenure, they sure as hell didn't like it when it was coming from some smug 20 year old career victim who hasn't even completed their Bachelor's. SJW's like Franchesca Ramsey, Lacey Green, Jonathan McIntosh and Arthur Chu have become literally no different than the far right Christian morality crusaders that were out in full force during W's tenure. "Same shit, different asshole" as the saying goes.

The bottom line is that the regressive leftist crybully faction of Hillary's supporters, did not make their case to vote for Hillary, but rather tried to bully and guilt trip people into voting for Hillary, and that just did not work. Not only did it not work, but it poisoned the rest of her campaign (if it wasn't already tainted by other things but that's outside the scope of this particular article).

Democrats need to take a look at themselves and realize, that they in part had a role in driving people into Trump's camp. It's easy to point the finger and blame some nebulous concept like "misogyny" or "racism" or "bigotry" or "Islamophobia" for all your problems, rather than looking into the mirror and seeing where it was that you went wrong, because to do that, is to admit you were wrong somewhere.

They have two years to figure this out and how to reform their party, which factions of the voter base need to be banished *cough*the regressive left*cough*, which platform stances need to be axed and flushed down the toilet.

That said...

Let me step out from the Salty Manx Cat persona. I'm not talking as a cranky white cat with no tail, but rather as my actual self.

I get it, some people are literally in fear of of their life. This was a thoroughly toxic election, where literally everything has been exaggerated, twisted, and taken out of context. an election so poisonous that it has literally brought out the worst that segments of society have to offer. There are multiple lessons to take away from all this. One of them is that you cannot fully entrust your own safety (be it physical or economic) to another. Because to do that gives them all the power, and then what happens when that power is turned on you?

For that reason you'll never see me wearing a safety pin. I'm not going to provide you with a safe haven, and it's not because I don't care about what happens to you, but rather because I have no desire to hold power over you. I won't provide a haven for you, but what I will do, is what ever I can, to help you make yourself safe. Be it help you to pick out a martial art to learn, to helping to pick out a gun that's a good fit for you, all you need to do is ask. You give a man a fish, you feed him for a day, you teach a man to fish and you feed him for life. You protect a man, you protect him for a day, you teach a man to protect himself and you protect him for life. While I can't do much as far as economic security, but even if we've been vehemently opposed on issues before if you're legitimately scared for your life, just ask and I'll help you.

The other thing this election has laid bare is the sheer corruption involved in both parties. On the Republicans side, it showed how out of touch it has gotten with the people. Out of touch to the point that party establishment stalwarts like Bush was just completely run over by someone like Trump.

On the Democrat side, the emails regarding the collusion between Hillary and the party higher ups, showed that this election was nothing about offering the voters their pick of who they thought would be the best candidate the Party had to offer. Instead what we was laid bare wasn't a market competition of ideas, but rather a byzantine power game.

The third point, to come full circle, is the collusion between mainstream media and the political power structure. That said, can you genuinely say that you can trust what the media has said? Personally I'd take anything said by the establishment media with a grain of salt. As the internet saying goes "pics or it didn't happen." The political establishment of both parties has a vested interest in keeping all of us divided, and it's favorite tool to accomplish that division is by leading the charge in "othering", can you really say that you can take what the media is telling you at face value?

That said, we all deserve better than behind the scene byzantine power games. We all deserve better than a political landscape where the way to win is by acting like a pro-wrestling heel from a era referred to as the "Attitude Era".

But as the saying goes, be the change you want to see. As Maslow's Hirearchy of Needs says,

One must satisfy lower level deficit needs before progressing on to meet higher level growth needs.

Safety is one of those lower level deficit needs. Until you fill that requirement, you can't move on, move on to the point, where you can effect that change. The thing is, no one is coming to save you, you have to watch your own back and fight your own battles. Certainly not a politician, and certainly not a media manufactured faux social movement.

And like I said earlier, unlike those politicians and faux political activists who'll tell them they will make you safe, they will provide a haven for you to run to to be safe, I will tell you something those people never will. I will help you make yourself safe, I will help you to make your own safe space. I have no desier to shield you with power (because honestly I'm just too lazy to bother), but rather, I would see you have the power.

Election 2016, Coroner's Report

So Orange Chicken er, I mean Donald Trump got the needed 270 Electoral College votes to be seated as President of the United States for the next four years. Shocking isn't?

Or is it...?

To figure this whole thing out, we need to go to the start of this whole campaign and see where Trump started. Just how the hell did this caricature of a '90's WWE Attitude Era heel become elected President.

The short answer is he came from the same place that Bernie Sanders did.

What do I mean by that? Well lets look back at the mood of the country in 2015.While unemployment was going down since a high point at 2010, and in fact getting close to pre-recession levels, the number of long term unemployed seemed to remain constant, The number of involuntary part-time workers (workers who would prefer full time work, but have been unable to secure it) also remained the same. Average work week in March of 2015 also went down slightly.

So basically things were getting better, but not at the rate people wanted it to. Naturally this would lead to frustration and who else would become the focus of that frustration but the ones in power? Essentially, the "Establishment". What would result in the coming months was growing populist anger at the status quo. The status quo here not being any particular Party, but rather the nebulous concept of "business as usual" in DC. The thought that our elected officials take us for granted or as tools to be used and discarded when done with.

Out of this came two people, two people with a promise to change the way things were done and to give a voice to the various marginalized (perceived or actual) groups in society. Those people were Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump. Now did it have to be Bernie and Donald? No, they just happened to be at the right place at the right time, were able to read the mood of the country and harness it. Bernie by doing what he can to expand equality of opportunity, and Donald, buy tapping into that deep rooted tribal mentality though his media, on camera experience with Vince McMahon's entertainment juggernaut.

Here we have this growing mass of anger and frustration at a government that it perceives to not listen and to not care about it's concerns. To Obama's credit I do think he was genuine in trying to help the country with RomneyObamacare, but it just wasn't enough, and so Bernie and Donald entered the stage. Bernie appealed to the Super Ego of this growing mass, while Donald appealed to the Id of this mass. The status quo/establishment/whatever you want to call it on both sides feared the both of them, and their growing support from the people.

At this point the Republican Party is throwing everything they can at this interloper. Trump wasn't part of their club, he forced himself in, forced himself in and started rearranging the furniture. They threw everything at him, and when they couldn't stop his runaway train, they jumped ship in a vain effort to stop him.

Thing is, they were the very entrenched political elite that the people were angry at. Jeb Bush? The Bush name is every bit associated with the concept of "political dynasty" as the name Kennedy, or the name... Clinton. Paul Ryan? Same thing, he's associated with Mitt Romney, another perceived entrenched elite. He rolled over them like a monster truck rolling over a bunch of scrapheap, junk cars from the '70s.

While Trump is going all Godzilla on the Republican establishment and swatting down every legitimate attempt to stop him, the Democrats have been watching the utter impotency of their establishment counterparts before The Trump. They start looking at Bernie with the same fear. Only here they don't try to take on Bernie in the open field, they don't want to get burned down the way 16 Republicans got trumped.

For at time it was starting to look like it would come down to which populist path the country would choose to take? Would the Super Ego prevail, or would the Id be indulged?

Enter "dirty" Debbie Wasserman Schults...

From behind the scenes Dirty Debbie worked with establishment darling Hillary Rodham Clinton to railroad Bernie Sanders. And Hillary herself, once denied the nomination against some unknown junior senator with a weird exotic sounding name, would not be denied a second time. Certainly not to some outsider interloper who thinks he can just come in and start redecorating. Dirty Debbie lead the shady behind the scenes efforts to derail Sanders and usurp the votes from his supporters for her collaborator Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Which as we all know, knocked Sanders out of the race. Leaving Mrs. Establishment to square off against Herr Populist, in a election with a climate of rage and frustration. And she wasn't off to a good start with the email leaks starting to happen as the election switches gears from primaries to general.

Let me reiterate that... the Democratic National Convention, ran the public's very personification of the Establishment, against a populist candidate, in an election where the tone set is that of populist rage at the Establishment.

No one in the room thought this was a bad idea...?

OK, so we've covered where Trump came from and how he got to the general election despite all expectations and all efforts. But how did he clinch the general election?

He didn't.

This was a case of the Democrats seizing defeat from the jaws of victory.

Let's remember the mood of this election season. Frustration and anger at the established political elite. A sense of being fed up, and mad as hell at the "usual suspects". In this mood, the Democrats nominated they very personification of what the anger was loosely directed at. Worse yet, Dirty Debbie and the DNC hierarchy gave a face to that nebulous concept of "the establishment".

And apparently no one in the room with the Democratic National Convention thought this was a very bad idea and a very risky gamble...?

And in all this, what did Hillary have to offer? What did she have to show everyone that it wouldn't just be business as usual? More of the same insincere politicking, more of Wall Street having a voice in the legislative process, more dirty politics, is what the angry masses perceived that she was offering them. But it doesn't stop there, what else does Hillary have to offer? More war. Hillary is a hawk, a hawk on the same level as the neo-cons that surrounded W. She voted yes on the Iraq war. She supported overthrowing Qadaffi which plunged Libya into chaos and made it into another haven for ISIS. She wants to take a more hawkish approach towards Putin and Assad, with her proposed no-fly zone over Aleppo that would inevitably bring us into conflict with Russia. She got Dick Cheny's endorsement for Christ-sake. More corporate cronyism, and more war, that's what Hillary appeared to have to offer. Maybe there's more than that, but she just didn't sell it.

Honestly she probably couldn't sell it. Simply put, she couldn't sell it because she is the Establishment. Did anyone really think that an angry populist mass would listen to anything the face of the Establishment has to say?

She played right into Trump's hands, and Trump didn't even need to set her up. In an election characterized by rage at the establishment, a loud mouth just bumbling his way though and not giving a single fuck would actually have some appeal, as he would be a person that would shake the ground the establishment stood on, and not just that, but he plowed though with confidence.

It certainly didn't help Hillary's image to go in the identity politics game. By getting into identity politics like with 3rd wave feminism, with the worst of Black Lives Matter (yes I understand it's a loose organization with sane moderates and psychotic fringe elements), she aligned herself with those elements, including the most demented and psychotic fringes of those movements. She put herself in the same boat as the politically correct, university campus Social Justice Warrior types. Hillary always had that party line voters that will vote blue no matter what, but she also had voters that she had to win over. You don't win over voters by browbeating them with accusations of being racist, sexist, or bigots, just because they're not with you. By doing that, you end up pushing the otherwise passive and indifferent potential voter, into voting for Trump out of spite. The far left SJW types are starting to revive more and more backlash, Hillary picked the wrong horse aligning with them.

While Trump was basically a rolling shit show, with gaffe after gaffe, Hillary seemed to be actively antagonizing voters that weren't with Her. She demonized gun-owners as those directly responsible for all the guns used in crime. She demonized those with opposing views on things like the supposed "wage gap" as sexist and misogynistic. She demonized those who don't think minorities are an oppressed second-class citizenry as racist. When it comes to the fence sitters, she didn't win any of them over, she scared them over and/or brow beat them into her camp.

Where as Bernie was running a campaign that was positive in tone, Hillary ran a wholly negative campaign.  A negative campaign that did not work against one Barack Hussein Obama back in 2008 and did not work yesterday against one Donald J. Trump.

So in the end, what just happened last night? What happened last night, was that we had an establishment candidate, with a vitriolic base (stealing Trump signs, arson at a GOP office, destroying public property by wreaking his Hollywood star, an assassination attempt on Trump...) that was more than happy to brow beat both the opposition and people just undecided. To call anyone not with Her, from the apathetic to indifferent to the open Trump supporter, every insult from misogynist to bigot for the sole reason that they didn't stand with their media manufactured messiah. In short, we had not only a toxic candidate with a U-Haul's worth of baggage, who is more than happy to attack, to some extent personally attack, the voters who weren't with her. A toxic candidate who couldn't connect to the voters, who couldn't read the mood of the country and ultimately crashed and burned. We have one Party that was run over by the Populist Ragemobile, and another Party with one faction that put one individual's personal political ambitions before the rest of the country (they nominated Hillary, knowing that things could go badly with her), took a gamble on her ambitions and lost, and now it's the rest of us who have to pay the gambling debt to the casino for the next four years. Just how did the DNC gamble with all of us as the poker chips? They ran the one candidate that could lose against Donald Trump, they opened the door to the possibility of, and now soon to be reality of, President Trump. That is how the DNC put a single individual's personal political ambitions before the country.

Was this a repudiation of the progress made under Obama's administration? No. Was this a vote for misogyny? No. Was this a vote for racism? No. Was this a vote for bigotry? No. Though is it being made out to be that because Hillary aligned herself with the SJW crowd that's always looking for something to be offended and cry oppression over. So as she went down and crashed and burned, she waived those flags on the way down, and the end result is makes it looks like her loss is because this country still embraces those -isms I just mentioned. But make no mistake the far left regressives will certainly scream as loud as they can about it to convince as many people that, this is indeed the case.

What this is, is a repudiation of the Establishment. A repudiation of the status-quo. As Michael Moore (I can't believe I'm referencing that fat bastard but he phrased it best) put it "...it will be the biggest fuck you to the establishment in American history." And a "big fuck you" it was indeed. This was a repudiation of the Establishment and the entrenched elite. This was a repudiation of the moral elitists who seek to put minorities on a pedestal while demanding the self-flagellation White people.

Donald Trump didn't win, he just happened to be Johnny on the Spot when the dust settled after the angry masses stopped swing the wreaking ball around. It could have been the corpse of Bernie Lomax being dragged around by Rich and Larry and it still would have won.

This whole thing is cyclical though, it happened before when Obama won the White House in a landslide and the Democrats took the House and Senate. In 2008 the Republicans were the establishment and were the ones trying to dictate morality to the people (the name "John Ashcroft" sound familiar to anyone?). The same thing happened to the Democrats last night that happened to the Republicans in 2008. They got too comfortable in power.

And that is the ultimate lesson here, nothing is a given. Karl Rove's "permanent Republican majority" was never a given any more than "President Hillary Clinton". Never underestimate a voting population's anger when it is directed at you

To Hillary supporters, take solace in the fact that American politics is cyclical. To Trump supporters, take heed that American politics is cyclical. To the Third Party and non-voters, make sure you got enough popcorn for the next four years because it's going to be one hell of a shit show.

Smart guns, guns without a market.

I've been fascinated with firearms for as long as I can remember, both on it's impact in history and as a mechanical device. From the precise clockwork of a Colt Single Action Army (the classic cowboy revolver) to the utter simplicity of the AK-47. If I were to make a list of my top inventors, John Moses Browning would be somewhere near the top.

The Browning M1895, the first successful gas-operated machine gun. 

For most of their existence guns have been a purely mechanical device, with some exceptions, like battery-powered, multi-barreled gatling guns. But aside from that, guns ran on springs, locks, gears, pistons and switches. Which brings us to today, with one group or another demanding that computerized locking devices be installed in guns.

Lately politicians have been trying to push so-called smart guns into the market, to the extent of trying to legislate it into the market to no avail. At best the gun owning community in general views smart guns with distrust and suspicion and at worst and attempt a backdoor gun-control via a "kill switch" signal that would permanently disable a smart gun. Basically, what happens in this scene in Metal Gear Solid 4 where the antagonist Liquid Ocelot remotely disables every smart gun on the planet... including those used by the military and police.

Hideo Kojima prediction the potential vulnerabilities of smart guns back in 2008. 

In fact, arms control plays a key role in the game's plot, being used to control populations and steer wars to their most profitable outcomes. The player is actually required to have guns that they find "jailbroken" to be able to use them.

For the most part, the gun owning community not only has no interest in smart guns, but out right shuns them and anyone even in the same room as them. Many on social media will flat out say that they will not trust their life to a computer controlled device, and given the various hacks and glitches we see happen with electronic devices who can blame them? Would you want a fire extinguisher that had an electronic lock instead of just a pin to activate? The more you add to a system the more things that can go wrong.

The other reason, is typical partisan politics. In New Jersey, Democrats had passed a law that would mandate all handguns for sale in the state were required to be smart guns after 3 years of being properly vetted and on the market. What instead happened was this essentially made smart-guns the equivalent of cancer, and the stores that did have plans to stock them were bombarded with protests, threats of boycotts, and old fashioned hate mail, to the point that German smart gun maker Armatix was practically run out of the industry by consumers in the US. The NJ law's days seem to be numbered, but the earth has already been salted. Having seen the Democrats try to unilaterally force this unwanted technology on community has only made the technology shunned even more.

Which brings us to this kid, Kai Kloepfer. For a smart gun symposium co-sponsored by Ron Conway, he created a fingerprint lock for a Glock pistol. Conway has heaped generous portions of praise on Kloepfer calling him "The Mark Zukerburg of guns" (no if anything Mark Zukerburg is the Mikhail Kalashnikov of social media, though even then I'm reluctant to compare Zukerburg to a legend like Kalashnikov). According to the article Kloepfer spend four years working on this, and to a degree I feel bad for him.

Because it's four years of his life he won't get back.

Ron Conway can praise Kloepfer all he wants. Him and the whole tech industry can tell Kloepfer that he'll "save America." But the simple fact of the matter is, this is a gun no one wants. Conway can accuse the industry for not innovating, but the maxim of "necessity is the mother of invention" stands true, and in the gun market there is no demand for smart-guns. No demand = no necessity. The only demand for them you'll find for them beyond politicians are collectors that see them as an oddity. In fact, if a company wants to stay in business and not be treated the equivalent of a Biblical leaper, the necessity is to not develop smart-guns, lest the consumer turn on you and do the economic/market equivalent of a lynching to you they way they did to Armatix.

Napster and Facebook are one thing, the centuries old firearms market is another.

"Kai Kloepfer didn't grow up surrounded by guns."

And that's the thing. He's from outside the gun-owning community, he doesn't why they do what they do, and think what they think. I'm not holding that against him, I'm just making an observation. He's on the outside making assumptions. Industry insiders like gun companies, on the other hand, do understand the community and are more often than not, a part of that community. They know, that the community has no demand for smart-guns, and in fact, the community will turn against you for even thinking about making a smart-gun, thanks to politics.

Being a teenager who grew up in an era of smartphones, battery powered devices might be an extension of his being, and while he might think his method if fail-proof, the fact of the matter is, it's still powered by a battery, it still adds another factor to mechanical device, adding yet another thing to a proven design that can fail. Pump shotguns are still in use for home defense because they are so simple and therefore reliable.

Kloepfer says the market for his invention is a generation of owners who look a lot like him. They’ve grown up in a world where technology and gun violence are both omnipresent. When they shop for a gun, “they’re looking for the same things they look for in a smartphone,” Kloepfer says. 

I don't know where he gets this impression actually. I've been in various gun shops across California and have conversed with shopkeepers and other customers and not once have I seen anyone asking about a "smart-gun", If anything the "owners who look a lot like him" (male teenagers) tend to lean towards the tacticrapped out AR-15s and AK-47s like what they use in Call of Duty or Battlefield, with all the optics, laser sights, and what not. I've had several prospective gun owners and new shooters approach me with questions. Not one had anything to do with smart-guns. Owners and prospective owners "who look a lot like him" are interested in high-tech "tactical" accessories, they want to feel like they're handling a military M-4 in a SOPMOD configuration with things with names like ACOG and EoTech, not feel like they're handling an "Apple iRifle".

Based on personal observations, younger guys are looking for things like this when they shop for a gun. They're not looking for Apple features. 

The other thing, is that "gun violence" is not omnipresent. Well maybe coverage of it is because of said technology. But according to the FBI violent crime has been on a downward trend since the '90s, continuing downward even after the sunset clause kicked in on Bill Clinton's useless Assault Weapon Ban and George W Bush refused to renew it.

“This is a world where a Model T is competitive with a Tesla,” says Kloepfer.

Again, this just tells me that this kid doesn't understand the community, the industry or firearms in general. While no one compares a Model T to something like Porsche Cayman GT4, both cars do run on engines that operate on the same principal, it's V6 385hp engine is just decades worth of refinement on the 4 cylinder 20hp internal combustion engine of the Model T. The analogy would be a French MAS-40 with a direct impingement gas system from 1940, and the SR-25 sniper rifle (think of it as a hot rodded M-16) that went into service in 2000 as the Porsche, no one says a MAS-40 is competitive with an SR-25. They use the same operating principals, but the SR-25 is a much more refined incarnation. If we're going to keep using this car analogy, then the Model T would be the M1895 in the cut-away picture you saw earlier, and the Tesla would be a the electric powered M134 Minigun (think, the big multi-barreled machine gun that Arnold uses in Terminator 2). Nobody is trying to say the M1895 is competitive with an M134.

In short Kloepfer doesn't really know what he's talking about.

At the end of the day though, this is nothing more than a quixotic crusade on Kloepfer's part because market principals still apply. No matter how great something it doesn't mean it's going to be profitable or have market penetration when there is no demand. Given the impressions that he has and statements he's made Klopefer seems to miss the fact that there is little to no demand for this product. Let alone an understanding of why there isn't a demand. Even his company's attempt to get Chris Cheng's endorsement only lead to Cheng pointing out that the community will be slow to embrase something unproven and that smart guns have a bad rap in the community because of politics. All Kloepfer has created is another incarnation of the industry pariah. As far as their target audience, gun-owners and prospective gun-owners, are concerned, the smart-gun industry may as well be a leaper colony, and the people that this device would impress and win praise from, are people who are against owning guns, and therefore have no intention of buying a gun to begin with.

The funny thing is, had Democrats not played fast and easy with other people's constitutional rights and left the matter to the market, there might actually be some smart guns on the market and not be treated like airborne ebola. Due to the fact that Kloepfer and Conway are outsiders to the gun community, and that due to political reasons there simply isn't any demand for their product among their target audience, this product and likely the entire Biofire company will be a bigger bomb than anything the daesh has suicided with. I think it should actually be in the market to let the consumer decide, but whether it lives or dies by it's own merit should be left up to the consumer, not ignorant law makers trying to create an artificial market with artificial demand though legislative fiat to score points with emotionally driven voters.

Personally I wouldn't have a problem with a "smart" device on a gun that I was using for purely sporting purposes. Something where if I have a electronic related malfunction I can call "Time" and resolve the issue. But for something like a home defense 12ga pump shotgun? No fucking way.

Triggered: I hate these so called "allies".

The following contains:
- Profanity
- Absolutely no consideration given to feelings.
- Scathing commentary.



Well I keep hearing the term "People of Color" tossed around more and more these days. I look down at my hands and they're brown, so I guess that makes me a person of "color", so let me just toss my 2 cents and a dime into this whole race crap.

Oh great so this guy's pissed off again, what flew up his ass now? Well this bullshit ass video.

OK first off, if you want to cosplay someone who's brown, like Josie Rizal from Tekken 7, and you happen to be White. Go right ahead, even if you need to use make up to get the skin tone right. This "marginalized person" is giving you permission to do so. You have my OK. The only thing I care about is that you get the whole shebang accurate to her design and her character.

You want to cosplay her and you're not brown, go right ahead anyway. Hell I'll even teach you a few Tagalog phrases if you want. All I care about is that you don't half ass the cosplay, because you know, do it right or don't do it at all. 

I'm a marginalized person of color, so therefore my opinions override hers and I'm saying "fuck that" when she says a character "isn't for you". You want to cosplay Josie and you're Irish pale, you go right the fuck ahead and do it, even if you have to do what ever it is those ganguro chicks in Japan do to look like that. I said it's ok, so bitch, don't you dare try to talk over my voice of color and say otherwise.

I'm as baffled about this as the rest of you. But when you consider this is in Japan, it kind of explains things. 

Do I think it's harmful if a White girl wants to be Josie at a convention? No. Because I don't let it be harmful to me. Like I said, the extent of my giving a fuck only goes as far as to the quality of the cosplay itself. I got more important things to worry about like potentially fatal work place hazards at my current employment, you really think a White girl cosplaying is going to be harmful to me?

At any rate, she said it's wrong to speak over marginalized people of color, so I'm automatically right, and she's automatically wrong, moving on.

Secondly no, you're not my ally, there ain't shit you can do that's useful enough for you to be an "ally". Bottom line is, I've been around the block several times, by contrast you look like a well off upper middle class person. That right there leads me to suspect that we already have little to relate over. That being said, how fucking arrogant do you have to be to assume that you have something to bring to the table and are fit to be my "ally"? I've fought my battles in life and took my hits and got back up and not once did I ever need someone like you around as my "ally" to accomplish what I set out to do. Your help was not, is not, and will not ever be needed. I was making my way in this world when you were still riding around in the back of mommy's SUV (or the equivalent of). Most of all though I'm as sure as the Sun is hot, that I will never have a need for anyone's self-serving White guilt driven help to get by. My life and experiences is not something for you to appropriate to soothe your mistakenly guilty conscience.

As you said, Whites like you have to listen to marginalized voices, and this marginalized voice is telling you to shut the hell up so by your own rules, you can stop talking now.

And here we go, the "safe space" bullshit. The only safe space you should need is where you eat, sleep, and shit. Out there, the world can be a real bastard, how do you expect to function if you need to run off to a "safe space" at every triggering act of microaggression? You want to know what my safe space is? My shitter. No one fucks with me when I'm taking a dump.

Now that's a REAL safe space right there, ain't no one messing with me in there when I'm nuking Hiroshima

By the way, assuming that I'm so weak, that I'd need you as an "ally" makes me uncomfortable, so therefore you aren't making a "safe space" according to that definition. Your behavior is upsetting to me, so feel free to change it, like now.

You can give the whole "ally" thing a rest and just worry about you're own shit. Minorities like myself aren't so weak that we'd need a young, upper-middle class, well off individual like yourself to be our "ally" and fight our battles. In fact, I sure as hell can put up a better fight deprived of sleep for three days and completely drunk off my ass, you ever could. If you really want to help, then just treat us like you would anyone else instead of putting us on a pedestal and prostrating yourself before the alter of Minority Worship that the regressive left has built over the graves of people like MLK Jr.

Die Macrossenlied: Macross Delta review

Overall Score: 15/20

C+

Now here's a franchise I've been following since I first saw it in the late '80s as Robotech: The Macross Saga. It was a little tough figuring out how to write this review. Did I want to do it all as a standalone show? Or do I want to do it in relation to other series in the franchise? Ultimately I decided to do a little of both, but in some areas, like the music, score it on it's own.

Also I wish I could give it something higher than a C+, but to be fair, objective, and maintain integrity (unlike, oh I don't know... damn near the entire gaming journalism industry), I had to give it the score it deserved and not the score I wanted to give it.

Oh yes, and naturally, there will be spoilers.


Plot: 4/5
The plot itself is pretty interesting in that it has some close connections to the immediate predecessor in the series Macross Frontier. This is a bit different from prior entries since they're so far removed from each other in some form or another, as to be standalone shows that you didn't need to have seen the show prior to know what's going on. Here on the other hand, it really helps to have seen Macross Frontier to be able to fill in some gaps and make connections.

The plot takes place in 2067 (eight years after Macross Frontier and 55 years after SDF Macross) at a sector on the edge of the galaxy that the New United Nations Government (UNG/NUNG), a galactic government that's suggested to be of a federal nature, sees as a backwater sector. To the point where we don't see any of the New United Nations Space Forces (NUNS) garrisons in the region in possession a Macross type vessel, and still rely on the VF-171 as opposed to the VF-25. As Delta takes places 8 years after Frontier and the VF-25 was in it's final testing phase, just one step away from deployment at the time of Frontier, the VF-25 has presumably been in service for 8 years now, and these garrisons still haven't been reequipped. Not only haven't they been equipped but they haven't even been upgraded to specs on the level of the enhanced VF-171EX. The VF-171 having been rolled out in 2046 has been in service now for 21 years.

You know your posting sucks when your equipment hasn't even been upgraded. 

Around the time of Frontier, there was an independence movement in the sector with the Kingdom of Wind seemingly seceding from the UNG in a bitter conflict that seems reminiscent of the Vietnam War. The show was kind of vague as to this, but it was the catalyst for a power struggle between the UNG and the Kingdom.

Where the tie in to Frontier comes in, is in the form of the Var Syndrome brain disease. After the Vajra left the galaxy at the end of Frontier, their departure some how resulted in the spreading of fold bacteria into the various humanoid species across the galaxy. Whether by his own design or not, Roid, who becomes the main antagonist, continues the work of the Macross Galaxy government in trying to forcibly network everyone together into a massive galactic hive mind.

In Delta, we kind of go back to having a group of idols like we did in Macross 7, though instead of a band with a lead and back up vocalist, we get an idol group.

Why have just a solo act when you can have a whole pop group?

Though here instead of weird "Spiritia" space magic, the abilities behind the singers are now given a scientific explanation. That being the fold bacteria left over from the Vajra, essentially expanding on the ideas used with Ranka and Sheryl's infections. Essentially Delta can be considered a sequel to Frontier.


Storytelling: 2/5
The protagonists are generally portrayed in a generally likable manner. Neither of the three main characters, Hayate Immelman, Freyja Wion, or Mirage Falynna Jenius come off as irritation or otherwise unlikeable to the point that the viewer starts to not care. Both women act as a foil to Hayate in some form or another. When we first meet him he's an aimless drifter taking random jobs here and there and ultimately getting fired from them from not putting in any effort. In contrast he runs into Freyja who knows what she wants and is dead set on it. On the other side there's Mirage who's overly serious about her job (which really works for her since just about the entire galaxy has high expectations for her, given her grandparents are Max and Millia of the original series and in-universe legends) were as Hayate has a carefree demeanor towards just about everything. Their relation at first is almost like a variation of the straight man, funny man combo.

Left to right: Mirage Falynna Jenius, Hayate Immelman, and Freyja Wion. 

Each of the three develop their characters as the story moves forward. Freyja gets her wish but realizes why she wanted that to begin with. Mirage is able to loosen up and move out from under her family's shadow and be her own pilot as opposed to just "Max and Millia's granddaughter", she's also able to express herself more when she starts to be the third wheel in the triangle. Finally, Hayate starts to become more serious about his job as a pilot and becomes more professionally about it as opposed to just being a bum who doesn't take work seriously.

This time around though, they did also do something a bit different in that Hayate could end up with both girls in the end. At the end it is implied that Freyja didn't have long to live so Hayate could very well end up with Mirage after Freyja passes away. I would wouldn't be surprised if we saw a tear jerker on-screen death for her in a movie adaptation.

The supporting characters are also well done and likable characters. At first I was wondering how they would get in enough character development for Walkure on an individual level. But it was accomplished. Each member had their backstories fleshed out, and two members, Reina Prowler and Makina Nakajima are possibly the first same-sex couple to be shown in the franchise. While not explicitly stated, there does seem to be more between them than just friends. I don't know if there was also a joke there with pairing up the members with the biggest and the smallest cup size in the group together, with Makina's breasts being almost as big as Reina's head.

"Boobs..." let me say that again. "Boobs"

Though the other supporting characters, mainly combat role members of Chaos PMC have gotten decreased development in comparison to the other series. The command crew of the Macross Elyssion gets minimal development, to the point you don't even notice the "bridge bunnies" on this ship, and Macross-class bridge bunny crew members have been a staple since SDF Macross. We literally know next to nothing about them. Though the half-breed Captain Ernest Johnson does get enough development to delve into his background and the view learns he's worked as a mercenary and combat instructor and always sided with the underdog faction. Along with Delta Squad leader Arad Mollers, both men have histories with the current Windermere regime, being the military instructors of the Kingdom's military leadership. We also get some development on the brooding war veteran Messer and the more laid back Chuck who runs a restaurant on the side, but in contrast they get much less development than the Walkure members.

...and he's about 7 and a half feet tall. One of his parents was obviously a commander-type Zentraedi. 

Though this might have been the result of having an episode cap and the series ending at 26 episodes. But on the other they could have been fleshed out more instead of having all of these filler episodes.

Which brings us to the villains. This is where I knocked off the majority of the points for storytelling. A good story needs to have good villains, and good villains, Macross Delta doth not has.

Generally, I don't much care for these guys...

OK I've seen every entry into this franchise, and the Kingdom of Wind is easily the most bland and boring villains of this whole franchise. Where as every series saw both the protagonist and antagonist faction on some level of parity (weak in one area but stronger in another) with the exception of Macross Plus, Delta on the other hand simply just gives the Kingdom a pre-pubescent deus ex machina in the form of Heinz the Wind Singer, and the Var Syndrome mind control. And this deus ex machina is all the Kingdom ever does. Attempt to assassinate Walkure? Var. NUNS confrontation? Var. Planetary invasion? Var. More NUNS forces? Var. Acid indigestion? Var. Menstrual cramps? Var. Erectile dysfunction? Var. Var Syndrome is literally their only solution to every single problem. Crummy gas mileage on your car? Yeah I'm sure Var can fix that too.

In Macross Zero, we had the UN and Anti-UN factions racing against each other to secure alien artifacts on the planet. In SDF Macross we had Captain Global and Commander Britai on opposite ends of a cosmic chess board matching wits against each other. In Macross 7, we had had the mind control element but it wasn't the only trick the Protodevin had up their sleeves. 7 had had a strange mix of relentless enemies, vampires and monster of the week elements. Frontier gave us weird enigmatic, hive minded space bugs who would evolve countermeasures against the SMS/NUNS's weapons including evolving carapace that could withstand a nuclear blast after the NUNS used their nukes too often. Frontier also had the conspiracy element that we last saw in VFX2. Macross II was a little different in that the UN forces found themselves up against essentially their Mirror Mirror counterparts, where singers were used not to bring peace the way Minmay had,but rather in the same manner as the Doof Warrior from Mad Max.

As a whole we saw both sides having to adjust to each other. In Zero we had Shin constantly learning and adjusting to Nora and Ivan's styles. In SDF we saw Global over use the Macross's Daedalus Attack and Britai use this to his advantage to get a boarding party into the Macross. 7 had the Fleet having to deal with each Protodevlin and their abilities. Frontier saw their Fleet in a state of constant R&D. But in Delta we see none of that. All we see is the Kingdom just Var'ing everyone each time, and each time the NUNS just falls for it. Their colonial garrisons get Var'ed, and one fleet they send into the sector after another just get's Var'ed. The result just starts to become as predictable in story telling as the use of recycled footage for combat scenes. There's no suspense of drama anymore. Towards the end the NUNS sends another fleet armed with dimensional weapons (think BIG black hole bombs) and they just get predictably Var'ed instead of having a massive do or die fleet battle. To the point where the viewer already knows they're just going to get Var'ed yet again.

Police brutality? There's a solution to that! Var induced rioting. 

The way the Var was used as a literary tool is Delta's weakest point. It's overused to the point of making the Kingdom of Wind a pack of one-trick ponies. Even the accomplishments of their so-called elite Aerial Knights gets watered down when you consider that every accomplishment they've made after Epi.2 came with Var support, after Epi. 2 you hardly ever see them shoot someone down who isn't being Var'ed, so essentially they haven't really done anything a monkey couldn't do. They're starting to remind me of Japanese pilot Warrant Officer Toshiyuki Sueda. This particular one-trick pony racked up 9 kills against F4F Wildcat pilots using the same trick. Over Wake Island he tried the same trick on an F6F Hellcat and paid with his life when it didn't work and the Hellcat lit him up. For half of this series I've just been waiting for the proverbial Hellcat to show up.

The main problem I have with the Var is that we never really see any weakness with it, hence why I call it a deus ex machina. Supposedly to activate it, it causes physical strain to Heinz, and yet we never see him collapse on stage to make that point. Additionally it also seems to be the perfect mind control weapon, in that the infected don't just go completely berserk and attack everyone, they always seem to know who to attack. I would have had one instance where Heinz collapses on stage and the Windermearans are unable to hold off a non-Var'ed NUNS fleet that breaks though and links up with the Macross Elysion with supplies and reinforcements (maybe an elite unit of VF-25s or production YF-27s refined with either manual controls for non-cyborg pilots, or a refined Brain Direct Imaging and Brain Direct Interface systems from the thought controlled YF-21 of Macross Plus, sent from Earth to serve as kind of friendly rivals to Delta Squad, hell even make it the VFX Ravens, that would be an awesome cameo). I would have also had one scene where the Var activation goes wrong and the victims go completely berserk and attack everyone forcing both sides to withdraw from the area. Something to show it's not that perfect and using it needs strategic considerations.

It's clear the NUNS was supposed to look as shady as MS Gundam's Earth Federation Space Forces, the State military, that while technically being on the protagonist's side, has some dirt on it's hands and skeletons in the closet. The problem though with the Var being a deus ex machina we don't really get to see the NUNS acting sinister, all we really get to see is them getting annihilated. That doesn't make them look shady, that just makes them look incompetent.

The ending was also another point where I had to knock off some points. The biggest complaint with the end of Macross Frontier was that while it resolved the main plot, it didn't resolve the love triangle at the end. Delta does the opposite. The triangle gets resolved but the war itself is left ambiguous. Were there peace negotiations? Did both sides attempt at reconciliation, or did things settle into a state or cold war? Or are both sides just gearing up for the next phase of the war? We don't know.

Lastly, is the overall presentation of the story. The pacing feels a bit weird and there are too many filler episodes. There could have been more action oriented scenes but instead we ended up with more narration than needed.

The tie in with Macross Frontier at the end could have been built up more. Roid's goal turned out to be the same as Grace's in the Frontier TV series and the Macross Galaxy colony leaders in the Frontier movies. It would have made it more interesting if Roid had ties to Galaxy in some form or another, Maybe he came across their research and decided to finish their work, or he took in members of the conspiracy sometime between Frontier and Delta.

Instead he just turns out to be yet another Space Hitler. 

Instead we get a relatively weak tie in on the protagonists side to the SDF-02 Megaroad 01's crew, with some hinting that "Lady M", the sort of background manipulator on the protagonists side is possibly Lynn Minmay, but leaves nothing in regards to any of the SDF-02's crew confirmed. Given that this is dropped near the end of the series makes it a complete dick tease, since it happens too close to the end to be able to do anything with it. Its thrown in there, but has little to anything done with it. It's said that they received a signal from subspace from the SDF-02, and that's pretty much it. So what, did the SDF-02 end up in another dimension? Trapped in Fold space? Are they somewhere in the galaxy hiding out from the current New United Nations Government administration for a particular reason? Also if Lady M is indeed Minmay, she would be about 74 years old. Also, if Lady M is Minimay then just what exactly is Chaos? Was it part of the SDF-02 colonial defense fleet at some point in history?

Too many unanswered questions at the end, and is practically begging for a movie or two to resolve these questions.

Sound and visuals: 5/5
Like prior entries into the series, the music gets a lot of emphasis. It was a bit tough to rank the music, on one hand I want to rank it down to a 4, but on the other hand I do really like the music for what it is.

I wanted to rank the music down to a 4 since it follows the same J-pop style music that Macross Frontier had. In contrast each series seemed to have it's own musical theme. Macross 7's music was rock, and Macross Plus went across genres with Yoko Kanno at the helm, but the songs generally had a more electronic style to it. SDF Macross did have pop music but it was '80s pop. Lastly Macross Zero's music had a more tribal feel to it. Just once I'd like to see a Macross series with a hip hop or rap theme, like the viewer is introduced to the series idol destroying people in a underground rap battle like Emimen. Have her be a "tough girl" type like Priss from Bubblegum Crisis. I decided to just look at the music for what it was, divorced from the rest of the series and ultimately didn't think it warranted being knocked down a point.

Then there is visuals and they certainly live up to the visual threshold set by Macross Frontier (which in a sense kind of seemed like Kawamori trying to embarrass Harmony Gold and their Robotech: The Shadow Chronicles) we also see another first in Macross with a sword fight between VFs that felt kind of reminiscent of Escaflowne. Though things do get a little fuzzy, when there is fast action happening, though you'll only really notice it if you pause the video during these segments.




Art style and design: 4/5
The art style and design more or less follows what was established in Macross Frontier. The ships in services with the NUNS are the same as what we saw in Frontier and despite being some nine years later, the VF-171 is still their main fighter. Though that could be because the sector where the series takes places is considered a backwater region and the more "prestigious" postings, like the Earth fleet or New Edwards Base, got the VF-25. The VF-171 we see haven't even been upgraded to the more heavily armed and armored EX variants.

The main protagonist mecha, the VF-31 series is yet another rehash of the YF-24 Evolution. The VF-31 is the production version of the YF-30 Chronos, which itself was based on the YF-24 (in-universe, in actuality it was probably based on the VF-25). The result is a fighter that bears a strong resemblance to the VF-25 (given that the YF-24 was the in-universe progenitor of the VF-25, YF-27, YF-29 and YF-30) and gives the feeling that Kawamori got lazy. On the other hand while the VF-31 is yet another derivative, the Sv-262 is a wholly new design based on the Saab 35 Draken. The paint style of the Windermearan Sv-262s, especially Keith's personal unit have a more flashy design to them, reminiscent of Zeon aces from the MS Gundam franchise. I can easily see it in the red and black with gold trim of the Sinaju in Unicorn Gundam. Though even as a new design, Kawamori seems to have taken a liking to skinny battroid designs as of late, it's been awhile since we've seen a beefy design like the YF-19/VF-19 and YF-21/VF-22 designs. Though on a side note Kawamori seems to have broken with his naming and number conventions on the VF-31, with planes with forward swept wings being named for swords and having a 9 in the model number (VF-9 Cutlass, VF-19 Excalibur, YF-29 Durandal, though to be fair the VF-31A which could be considered the base line model does not have FSW). Though I can see why he would do that here, when you look at the names of the rival VF-31 Siegfried and Sv-262 Draken III, it's more than likely a reference to the Volsung Saga where Sigurd slays the dragon Fafnir.

VF-31 Siegfried

Sv-262 Draken III

The SDF/C-108 Macross Elysion herself seems to be an amalgam of design elements from the SDF-01 (TV and Movie variants), the New Macross-class and the Macross Quarter Type. Elysion takes her overall layout and transformation sequence from the Quarter. The design stylings of her legs and the way her Macross Cannon functions is similar to the New Macross-class Battle 25/Frontier, the over all styling of her main hull is reminiscent of the SDF-01 DYRL version, while her "arms" are clearly influenced by the SDF-01 TV version with them being held up in the same pose and having the appearance of maritime vessels. I'd say Elysion is easily my favorite Macross derivative next to the DYRL redesign. Though her in-universe origins are never explored, given her hull number she doesn't seem to be a one-off design having "108" as her hull number indicating she's at least the 8th of her class. One one hand she might be a production version of the Macross Quarter, she also about twice the size of the Quarter. We also see something relatively new with the Elysion's left arm, the Aether, acting independently. While prior Macross types have been considered compound warships with various blocks being separate ships, this is the first time we any of those components carrying out operations on it's own, not counting standalone ARMD-class carriers, except for maybe the Macross 7's gunship (memory fails me on that one) but even then it isn't on the scale that Aether operates on.


Even at the end of the series when the ship is grounded it's in a state similar to the SDF-01 Macross at the end of the TV series, lacking it's right arm and the booms on it's back blown off, and lying in a position similar to the SDF-01 when it was downed in DYRL.

Just chillin'

Though, whereas in Frontier the main civilian section was modeled on San Francisco, here in Delta it's more modeled on a South East Asian style coastal town. Right down to the cuisine being sea food based with the main dishes being fish and jellyfish, and survival rations being a tin of sea spiders. It gives the series a kind of backwater/resort town feel in contrast to the futuristic metropolitan areas we see in Macross Frontier, Macross 7 and Macross Plus. Plus especially since we get to see the UNG capital Macross City with holographic displays across the city.

Overall while the VF-31 is essentially another rehash of a tired design, the Sv-262 does bring something completely new to the table and the Elysion is actually a really nice blending of aspects from all the previous existing Macross-classes into an aesthetically pleasing package. Additionally we also see cameos of classic designs like Zentraedi Regult and Glaug battlepods, as well as a VF-22S serving as a Chekov's Gun in a few episodes.

Final Verdict: Flawed but still has it's high points. 
Macross Delta definitely has it's flaws, it certainly is nowhere near as good as the original SDF Macross was and I wouldn't even considering as good as Macross Frontier was. Despite that, it's flaws at least are largely localized to it's story telling. The plot itself was interesting enough, but it's in the way it was told that has problems. The fight scenes that do happen between the Knights and Delta are still exciting and great to watch. The music, while similar to Frontier's is still enjoyable and the fast tempo of the songs go hand in hand with the frantic combat scenes. While Elysion doesn't really do much compared to the Quarter, when it does do something, it's something to behold.

Overall Macross Delta is still an enjoyable experience and introduces several new elements into Macross canon. The "enemy singer" thing is new to the main canon but it was something we saw in the non-canon AU Macross II. It's a safe bet to say there will be a movie or two to flesh out the loose ends of the series. Pretty much every entry in the franchise got some point of movie or OVA adaptation or accompaniment, and this one needs it.

Triggered: Segregation today! Segregation tomorrow! Segregation forever!

The following contains:
- Scathing socio-political commentary
- Liberal use of Profanity
- Copious amounts of sarcasm
- No giving of fucks for your feelings
- No giving of fucks for you safe space

Segregation today! Segregation tomorrow! Segregation forever!
    - George Wallace

You know, when I was a kid and I saw this asshole saying this bullshit in documentaries, I just laughed at him. Like "haha look at this asshole, Everything's moving away from that kind of ignorant driven racism, and now he's just a kind of social dinosaur from a less enlightened era."

At least that's what I thought when I was a kid back in the '90s (fuck I miss the '90s...).

Fast forward to some 20 something years into the future from my childhood I see this fucking bullshit.

Segregated housing will now be available to black students at California State University Los Angeles as a means of combating “microaggressions” and “racially insensitive remarks.”

Maybe that Wallace asshole wasn't making a declaration, maybe he was making a prediction or a prophesy. That segregation would continue to be implemented rather him perpetuating it from office.
Now before I proverbially wail on Black Lives Matter and the regressive left as a whole once again, let me put it out there that I'm against this kind of thing for every race, unless there's some kind of traditional living aspect to the arrangement. It defeated the whole point of college as an intellectual space unless there's a educational aspect to it rather than yet another bullshit "safe space". Though I could be persuaded to go along with separate housing for students from overseas.

THIS is what I think of your "safe space", I will blast that shit from orbit!

CSU LA did try to justify this fuckery by saying

The Halisi Scholars Black Living-Learning Community is designed to enhance the residential experience for students who are a part of or interested in issues of concern to the black community living on campus by offering the opportunity to connect with faculty and peers, and engage in programs that focus on academic success, cultural awareness, and civic engagement....

...This living-learning community focuses on academic excellence and learning experiences that are inclusive and non-discriminatory. This community is open to all students.

I don't buy this shit and here's why.

WE DEMAND the creation and financial support of a CSLA housing space delegated for Black students and a full time Resident Director who can cater to the needs of Black students.
Many Black CSLA students cannot afford to live in Alhambra or the surrounding area with the high prices of rent. A CSLA housing space delegated for Black students would provide a cheaper alternative housing solution for Black students. This space would also serve as a safe space for Black CSLA students to congregate, connect, and learn from each other. (italics mine)

"Safe space for Black CSLA students". University admin can try to spin it all they want, that this housing project is inclusive and non-discriminatory, but the ones that demanded this housing to begin with have flat out said in their demands that this is to serve as a "safe space". It is a "safe space" for Black students, where Black students can connect and learn from other Black students.

So, translating SJW-speak to contemporary English vernacular, what they really mean is this.

Sure maybe they're du jure non-discriminatory, but I got five on it, that it's de facto segregation. I never though I would ever see this, but we have come full circle to the point now where the "coloreds" are demanding segregation. Doesn't that go against everything that people like Martin Luther King Jr. fought for? These the very people that Malcolm X referred to as "zombies" after his tours in North Africa.

This also goes against what Malcolm X preached in that these Blacks are demanding that the same government he said was unwilling/incapable of protecting it's Black citizens, fix their problems. MLK Jr. dreamed of a world where character mattered not skin color. Malcolm X preached for a strong Black community that stood on it's own strength.

This goes completely against everything the Civil Rights movement of the '60s and '70s were pushing for. Not only that, but it continues to go against the entire point of going to college. The point of going to college is to further develop your views and to refine your skills and pick up new ones. How do you develop your views? You learn from other views and you have your existing views challenged by opposing views. Those challenges come from both the academic sphere, political sphere and social sphere.

But now we have this segment of the population that sees challenge as a "microaggression" (yes I use Urban Dictionary since in many instances, the contemporary social definition is different from the academic definition). Society raised up this fragile society of kids told that they were special from day fucking one, and given awards and trophies just for fucking showing up with a pulse and brain activity. It's kind of like some warp, twisted and fucked up version of when Mr. Rogers would tell children they're special in their own way. That's true and what he meant by that was everyone had something they were good at, everyone had something going for them, and everyone could achieve what they set out to do. Instead we now have this view of "being special" as being put up on a pedestal. The result is this segment of a generation that can't handle being told they're wrong. Instead these people blow everything out of proportion and have to cry about every little fucking thing that does completely conform to their own specific world view (funny enough that's also the same reason why you see regressive leftists frequently eat each other).

Where this particular rabbit hole takes us is to a bizzaro realm where supposed adults in society require "safe spaces" because they are unable to function in society. They can't handle being told they're wrong, and therefore not special, after being put up on a special pedestal all their sheltered lives. But because they've been held up on a pedestal all their lives and told that their feelings matter and constantly asked how something made them feel (giving the false impression that people like me, and the world at large, give a shit about their feelings) they're also not equipped to handle a challenge to their believes, and are unable to think analytically. They are unable (but not incapable, they just don't know how) to form a solid Aristotelian argument, and instead fall back to screaming and running away when confronted with an opposing view.

Ultimately where we end up is here, with these people demanding the return of segregation. Demanding compartmentalization of society to levels unseen since we had feudalism and a class system. The left has gone so far to the left that they have gone full circle and have become the right. Did that asshole George Wallace foresee this? Is this what he meant by "Segregation forever!"

And this is why I hate SJWs so fucking much. This false progressivism does nothing more than to push a weakness of character. A community, a society is only as strong as it's weakest member, and this regressive (I'm not going to dirty the name of Theodore Roosevelt by associating these weak, overly sensitive and generally pathetic people with his Progressive Party.) movement rejects intellectual discourse in exchange for both emotional coddling and this sort of social feudalism with a social classes based, not upon wealth and birth status, but rather on perceived levels of victimhood. Or maybe it's more appropriately called a victimhood based caste system. A system where the more victimhood/oppression points you can tally up, the higher the class/caste you belong to. Rather than being someone who can take on the world, what SJWs push for instead creates people so weak that they demand that the world adjust to their fragile sensibilities. Rather than taking on and overcoming ever challenge life has to throw at them, the regressive leftist expect someone else to make that obstacle go away for them. As someone who's completed a Juris Doctris I would LOVE to see one of these SJWs in the first month of law school, they would literally be eaten alive by their professors and their non-SJW peers. Professors will not let up on you no matter now much you cry "oppression" and "microaggression". NO ONE gives a fuck about feelings in your law school work. You are straight FUCKED if all you can do is spout off SJW buzzwords and can't form an argument advocating for one side.

This whole victimhood thing is nothing more than an extension of the special snowflake mindset. This happened to me, therefore that makes me special. It's the same shit as the self-centered woman who decides to be a mom just to parade around her trophy kid to attract more attention to herself by saying "hey look at ME, I'M a mom!". When people stop treating them special as they grow older, they go find some other reason to make themselves special, and they do this by making themselves a "victim" of something. They're essentially saying "look at ME! Something bad happened to ME so you have to be nice to ME!" Just like that fucktard Bonita Tindle who thought some random White guy with dreadlocks was "oppressing" her. Most people probably wouldn't give two-shits about her if she was just Bonita Tindle, but people will listen to and give special treatment to "Bonita Tindle the victim of racism!" Speaking of that moron, I wonder if she changed her name to something like "Binata Kalejayie" given that "Bonita" is a name of Latin and therefore southern European origins, and the surname of "Tindle" is of Scottish origin, therefore she is appropriating two European cultures with her name.

Worse yet, these same fucktards actively work to roll back the real progress made in society. It took Ike deploying the National Guard to get the dominoes falling to set the stage for Brown v. Board of Education. It took the work of MLK Jr. and all his supporters to bury Jim Crow, and yet here we are, with a minority group, demanding the return of the same Jim Crow segregation, under a softer sounding name. maybe I ought to call it James Crowe?

I mean seriously just look at this shit, look at this shit and just marvel at the sheer madness of this. The regressive left like to constantly harangue the rest of society over what year it is (yeah I know it's two-thousand-fucking-sixteen, I actually paid attention to math class instead of crying over how sexist math is.)  and yet here we are, 20-fucking-16 and the same regressive leftists are calling for segregation like it's 1963 all over again. As a kid and a teenager I never thought I'd see anything other than some of the more psychotic White supremacist fringe elements calling for a return to segregation, and yet here we fucking are, with a minority group that was heavily discriminated under segregation, calling for the return of segregation. Only now they do it under the pretense of establishing a "safe space". Well what in the fuck did you think "Whites Only" places were shit-for-brains?! They were "safe spaces" for White people. What, it's fucked up when White people do it but not for you?

Fuck this shit, this shit gets the blood pressure up, next post will probably be another retro review, maybe Parasite Eve.